An open Jev-style LoRA on Qwen3.5-9B from Bespoke Labs, trained on 2,676 contrastively curated examples to score the allowed answer tokens directly for enums, booleans and rubric levels. Recipe, data and a public benchmark suite are released with it.
Unofficial NoulXP package of Convai Innovations' Laya multilingual (Apache-2.0), fp32-o23: checked against the model's own answers, none changed. Not made by Convai Innovations.
Decides
choice, noul, score, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
nimble
laya
Fine-tuned from
qwen/qwen3.5-9b
convai-innovations/laya
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights + hosted API
Open weights
Hosted by
Bespoke Labs
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
90.1%
—
Calibration error
0.054
—
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
106 ms
44.9 ms
p95 latency
—
742 ms
Evaluation suite
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between bespoke-nimble-9b and laya-multilingual-noulxp?
bespoke-nimble-9b is from Bespoke Labs and laya-multilingual-noulxp from Convai Innovations. bespoke-nimble-9b has open weights and a hosted API; laya-multilingual-noulxp has open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, noul, score, classify and route questions. bespoke-nimble-9b reads up to 8K tokens of state, against 1K tokens for laya-multilingual-noulxp. laya-multilingual-noulxp is the smaller model, at 322M parameters to 9.0B.
Which is more accurate, bespoke-nimble-9b or laya-multilingual-noulxp?
Only bespoke-nimble-9b publishes an accuracy figure (90.1% on Bespoke held-out set (324 examples)); laya-multilingual-noulxp does not, so there is no comparison to make without your own test.
Which is cheaper, bespoke-nimble-9b or laya-multilingual-noulxp?
bespoke-nimble-9b: Hosted, price not published, or free to self-host. laya-multilingual-noulxp: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Which is faster, bespoke-nimble-9b or laya-multilingual-noulxp?
By their publishers’ figures, laya-multilingual-noulxp answers in about 44.9 ms at the median and bespoke-nimble-9b in about 106 ms — measured on different hardware, so treat it as a rough guide.
Can I run bespoke-nimble-9b or laya-multilingual-noulxp locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull bespoke-labs/bespoke-nimble-9b and systemone pull convai-innovations/laya-multilingual-noulxp download the weights.
Bespoke held-out set (324 examples)
Measured by System One Models on 2026-10-05: one question per request, 4 threads of a Xeon Gold 6342
