Telnyx's hosted decision models, in beta on Telnyx Inference. One request carries shared state and up to 64 typed questions (choice, yes/no noul, ordered score) and returns a probability per option, with no generated text, on a TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone route.
A 144M-parameter System One model on the multilingual mmBERT-small encoder. Takes a state, a question and 2 to 20 options and returns one decision with probabilities for choice, score and yes/no questions, on a CPU.
Decides
choice, score, noul, classify, route
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
telnyx-decision
julia
Fine-tuned from
—
jhu-clsp/mmbert-small
License
proprietary
apache-2.0
Availability
Hosted API
Open weights
Hosted by
Telnyx
—
Input price
$0.035/MTok
—
Decision accuracy
—
73.2%
Calibration error
—
—
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
—
—
p95 latency
—
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between decision-flash and julia-1?
decision-flash is from Telnyx and julia-1 from Supersonic Labs. decision-flash is only available as a hosted API; julia-1 has open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score, noul, classify and route questions. decision-flash is licensed proprietary; julia-1, apache-2.0.
Which is more accurate, decision-flash or julia-1?
Only julia-1 publishes an accuracy figure (73.2% on typed-decisions test set (400 cases, 2,000 questions)); decision-flash does not, so there is no comparison to make without your own test.
Which is cheaper, decision-flash or julia-1?
decision-flash: $0.035 / $0 per 1M. julia-1: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Can I run decision-flash or julia-1 locally?
julia-1 yes — systemone pull supersonic-labs/julia-1 downloads its weights. The other is only served as a hosted API.
—
Evaluation suite
—
typed-decisions test set (400 cases, 2,000 questions)
