French medical decision models by Bofeng Huang: pass a patient message or clinical note, a question and candidate answers, and get one probability per answer from a single forward pass. Choice, score and noul. A research model, not a medical device.
A 4B decision model fine-tuned from Qwen3.5-4B-Base. A state and typed questions (choice, yes/no, score) go in; a temperature-calibrated probability for every option comes out of one pass, through a self-hosted /v1/systemone-compatible server. Apache-2.0 weights and code.
Decides
choice, score, noul
choice, score, noul, classify, route
Architecture
docto-decision
wald
Fine-tuned from
qwen/qwen3.5-4b
qwen/qwen3.5-4b-base
License
apache-2.0
apache-2.0
Availability
Open weights
Open weights
Hosted by
—
—
Input price
—
—
Decision accuracy
88.9%
88.3%
Calibration error
0.079
0.045
Valid action rate
—
—
Median latency
47 ms
33 ms
p95 latency
—
168 ms
Evaluation suite
Docto Decision Bench fr v0.1 (12 tasks, mostly silver labels; the maker's own benchmark)
Figures are from each model’s manifest; accuracy and latency are what the publishers report, on their own suites and hardware. Add a third model.
Questions
What is the difference between docto-decision and wald?
docto-decision is from Bofeng Huang and wald from ORG2 AI. Both have open weights you can download and run. Both answer choice, score and noul questions. Only wald answers classify and route. wald is the smaller model, at 4.2B parameters to 4.7B.
Which is more accurate, docto-decision or wald?
They report on different suites — docto-decision 88.9% on Docto Decision Bench fr v0.1 (12 tasks, mostly silver labels; the maker's own benchmark), wald 88.3% on JevBench public set (231 items; 204 correct), maker's run with the JevBench CLI, v1.2, effort none; items used as a development scoreboard — so the numbers do not rank them. Test both on your own labelled examples.
Which is cheaper, docto-decision or wald?
docto-decision: Free (open weights). wald: Free (open weights). Open weights cost nothing per call beyond your own hardware.
Which is faster, docto-decision or wald?
By their publishers’ figures, wald answers in about 33 ms at the median and docto-decision in about 47 ms — measured on different hardware, so treat it as a rough guide.
Can I run docto-decision or wald locally?
Yes, both: systemone pull bofeng-huang/docto-decision and systemone pull org2ai/wald download the weights.
JevBench public set (231 items; 204 correct), maker's run with the JevBench CLI, v1.2, effort none; items used as a development scoreboard
Latest version
0.1.0
1.2.0
Variants
LICENSE, adapters
Dockerfile, LICENSE, NOTICE, model-files, reference, server
